Tracy and Colleagues,
I am the new chair of the IALCP Board and have not yet had the opportunity to introduce myself fully. At this time, however, I am writing on behalf of the IALCP Board.
First, please know the IALCP is, and always has been, the umbrella organization for all life care planners. As we all know, life care planning is a transdisciplinary and diverse practice, with many different professions and certificate holders practicing in this arena. Our role is to be a "uniter" and not a "divider".
We look forward to participating in resolving any issues among the groups.
I acknowledge the request for transparency and provide the following:
-CEU requests are submitted to all certifying organizations in advance of educational events. This includes CRC, CLCP, CDMS, CCM, CNLCP, and ABVE among others.
-These certifying bodies have pre-approved CEUs for IALCP programs in the past.
-Members in this community and on this Board dedicate and volunteer significant time and energy to organize and prepare for Summits, Symposiums and educational events. We seek quality speakers to provide information for our members to stay up to date and abreast of current issues and changes in the specialty practice of life care planning. We have again done this for the upcoming Symposium.
-The IALCP Board firmly believes that any personal issues should have no bearing on pre-approval of CEUs. We will again be submitting CEU requests for the upcoming Symposium and future educational events to all certifying organizations.
-Should a certifying organization not pre-approve credits, we will ask for insight and take steps within our power and ability to resolve any issues related to the quality and content of the proposed presentations, as we have done in the past. We have and will continue to work hard to obtain quality speakers at educational events for members.
-We encourage certificate holders of any organization that has denied pre-approved CEUs to request further explanation from the denying organization directly.
The IALCP will continue to work hard as the umbrella organization for all life care planners. This is a wonderful community, full of great members and volunteers who are highly dedicated to our specialty practice of life care planning. We encourage everyone to attend the upcoming Symposium and Conference. Please see the link to the upcoming Symposium schedule at
https://rehabpro.org/page/conference-schedule for more information about the content being provided.
We look forward to continuing these efforts for members. Please do not hesitate to ask further questions of the IALCP Board. Our goal is to be transparent and assist in any way we can moving the specialty practice of Life Care Planning into the future.
Thank you,
On behalf of the IALCP Board:
-Nick Choppa, Chair
-Susan Riddick-Grisham, Past Chair
-Elizabeth Zaras, Chair-Elect
-Laura Woodard – Representative to IARP Board of Directors
-Sarah Malloy – Member at Large
-Brook Feerick – Member at Large
-Paul Ramos – Member at Large
-Tricia Morrison – International Liaison to IALCP Board
------------------------------
Nick Choppa
Rehabilitation Counselor/Case Manager/Life Care Pl
nick@osc-voc.comSeattle, WA United States
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 08-20-2022 12:30
From: Tracy Albee
Subject: Issues between IARP and ICHCC
Good afternoon, Colleagues
I do not know how many of our CLCPs are on this forum and also on the ICHCC Collaborative Group email distribution / listserv, so I thought it prudent to share. On 08/12/22, I posted an email, followed by a second one on 08/13/22, to the ICHCC Collaborative Group asking questions regarding:
1. Why ICHCC did not provide CEUs for our May 2022 Summit
2. Why I had heard that ICHCC was not going to provide CEUs for our October 2022 Symposium and Conference
3. How it was that the AAACEU's continuing education, which is the primary way CLCPs can in fact get their hours for recertification, is being taught by an ICHCC Commissioner
3. Why CLCPs have not had an update on the goal to get our certification body ICHCC accredited/approved for accreditation by the ANSI [American National Standards Institute] (now now called ANAB)
The emails I sent did upset two CLCPs on the ICHCC Collaborative Group listserv, who felt this discussion was not appropriate on the public forum. Several other CLCPs added to the discussion with similar concerns and questions. At least ten other CLCPs emailed or called me privately, who supported my posts, but did not intend to post publicly about their opinions for whatever reason.
To Kathleen May's credit, she called me directly on Sunday to try and explain some of the issues from their perspective and to update me on the ANSI situation. I very much appreciated having the opportunity to air my concerns verbally with Mrs. May, although in the end, i still do not have many answers. She did share that the ICHCC has had many discussions with IARP Leadership [Not IALCP Leadership] to try and work out the issues at hand [although I cannot articulate what exactly the issues are] but that she feels the negotiations are going nowhere at the moment, and she is not hopeful that ICHCC will be approving educational content in the immediate future. She called out some of our leaders by name, whom I will not share here publicly, but based on the information I was given, I feel that maybe IARP leadership / management is not being completely transparent on what the issues are. While I do not believe it is entirely our organization's fault by any means, there does appear to have been some missteps along the way that have made this situation worse and potentially not repairable.
There was a follow up email to the ICHCC Collaborative Group from IARP leadership this last week, after seeing the Friday through Sunday posts. That email stated that the conference documentation for getting approved for CEUs by all of the certifying agencies, is in progress, and not submitted yet, so we do not know what will and will not be approved quite yet. I completely understand that fact, but based on what I have been told by ICHCC, they will not be providing us CEUS for the CLCP, regardless of the quality content of the presentations. This is no longer about if our educational content meets the standards. This is way bigger than that. I think it is important for our CLCPs to know this now, before they start spending money on travel arrangements or turning down work because they will be out of the office for most of a week.
Let me be clear, I will be at the Symposium, and I am in no way discouraging any of our members to not to go the October event. I for one, find greater value in the networking with my colleagues and learning new information, then my CEUs / CLCP provide to me on paper. I also think we need to come together to have face to face meetings about these current challenges.
What upsets me is that I feel very in the dark as to what has been going on behind the scenes between the two organizations and how there has not been any transparency provided to us, the members, by IARP or ICHCC . IARP is an organization that WE pay for. WE volunteer for. WE advocate for. Their job is to support US. They work for US. There have been lawsuits filed against a couple of our IALCP members in the past year that have been kept under wraps. No one is talking about it [those who were sued cannot talk about it openly]. IARP knew of the lawsuits, they have not supported those members, even when one suit included a volunteer leader who should have been protected from these types of claims.
Mrs. May actually asked me if I could somehow help to resolve the problems that lay before us. I would love to be involved in that, but I cannot help to resolve problems that I do not understand. I am told by Mrs. May that there are years of paper trails that document the issues at hand. There are organizational problems and there are exchanges which have become very personal. Neither are going to be resolved easily, if at all.
I implore IARP and ICHCC leadership to provide our members the information we need to make our own best decisions. While again, I reiterate that I will be at the Symposium, if for no other reason, to have face to face discussions with each other and those involved, but also because these are the professional decisions that I am facing and I think all of you are as well:
- Do I attend future conferences for the love of networking and education, if they do not provide me what I need to stay certified?
- Do I even keep my CLCP designation in the future and does it really even have any value any longer?
- Do I continue my membership in an organization that may not actually support me if I need them?
- Do I volunteer to work for an organization that may not support me if I need them?
I encourage everybody to continue the conversation and think about what we, as an industry of life care planners, should be doing at this point to make a difference. We are already a splintered community in many ways and this is making it much worse.
------------------------------
Tracy Albee
tracy@medilegalinc.com
TRACY, CA & HENDERSON, NV
United States
------------------------------