Well, it's a bit shocking when I see someone bring up a question I asked some 8 years ago, Mike! :) That said, this is something that really isn't resolved for me. My recollection is that there are consensus statements from past summits indicating we include items that are "more likely than not". That said, I see providers use all kinds of terms that, imho, muddy the water - likely, probably, possible, potential, etc.
I look forward to hearing what the collective has to offer. And I now know for sure I need to be careful how I say things around here. :)
Katherine
Katherine S. Dunlap, MS, LCPC, CRC, CLCP
Dunlap Rehabilitation Services LLC
PO Box 1826
Livingston, MT 59047
she/her
Electronic Disclosure Statement: This e-mail is NOT ENCRYPTED. If you are communicating about a client, please do NOT place the person's name or personal information in the e-mail or subject line but use non-descriptive identifiers since this is an unsecured form of communication. Any communication regarding a client is considered work product and will become part of the file. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and remove the information from all electronic and hard copy sources. Storing, printing, or disseminating this e-mail to other parties is prohibited unless authorized by the sender.
Original Message:
Sent: 1/19/2025 5:49:00 PM
From: Mike McCord
Subject: Citation for inclusion of only probable items and services in LCP
Hi all,
I'm dusting off this question Katherine Dunlap posed back in 2017. I believe we all adopt the practice that only services that have been deemed to be "probable" are included in and costed in the life care plan. However, I cannot find a clear citation in any of our relevant literature. I'm very clear on what the definitions of "probable" and "potential" are in the legal sense. Can anyone point me to a reference for LCP practice?
Many thanks.
------------------------------
Mike McCord
mike@mccordrehab.com
Atlanta, GA United States
------------------------------