Thank you all for your input. I am consulting with the contracting attorney. While she/they will have to agree to it, I feel that I must also consent. I was not aware that this practice is a common occurrence in PA and I thank you for that info, Maria. Apparently, they even do this for IMEs! The contracting atty was informed the same. Since it is, I am more cautious as they certainly should have been brought up well in advance of this evaluation, scheduled over two months ago. The ambush was blatantly unacceptable, and I will make it known. I am still curious on how it may be used in PA courts. Could this have a negative effect on me and my practice?
Michelle, I recall that war story. I was there. I can't remember what city it was in...I've attended several war story segments and really enjoy them. And as you and others have said, I certainly will not allow anyone present for any testing. I don't see anyone having a problem with that.
To clarify, it is not being recorded, just transcribed by the stenographer. I like the idea of having my own stenographer, and I will most certainly demand a copy of their transcription ASAP and the opportunity to make corrections.
What I don't like about it purely being a transcription is that intonations are missed. I am a human and relate to evaluees as I do all other humans, with small talk, smiles, laughter and sometimes sarcasm. (I am, after all, a counselor, and want all to feel at ease). All those would be missed in a pure transcription, as we have all seen in text messaging gone awry. I almost prefer it to be a video recording!
Thank you all again. This is very helpful!
------------------------------
Connie L. Standhart, MS, CRC, ABVE/F
Peak Solutions Vocational Services
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 01-21-2026 13:44
From: Maria A. Babinetz
Subject: Stenographer Present at Online Vocational Evaluation
Connie and colleagues,
This is an excellent question, and I agree with your underlying concern. Being surprised by a third-party stenographer at the start of a vocational evaluation is not an acceptable way to proceed, particularly in a forensic context, where the evaluation's conditions should be clearly defined in advance.
Practicing regularly in Pennsylvania (including matters venued in Philadelphia County), my approach has been:
If any party intends to have a court reporter/stenographer present for a vocational evaluation, it should be raised in advance and coordinated through counsel. At a minimum, this should occur with appropriate notice and clear agreement on the conditions.
If transcription is requested, the parties should clarify in advance what is and is not included, to avoid ambiguity about the process or the record being created.
If a court reporter is present, I should be provided with a copy of the transcript as soon as practicable after the evaluation. I also reserve the right to review it for accuracy and, if needed, submit corrections/clarifications in writing (errata-style).
While a vocational evaluation is not a deposition, a transcript can later be treated like sworn testimony in practice. Ensuring an accurate record protects all parties and reduces the risk of unnecessary disputes.
If a transcript is created, expectations should be set in advance regarding distribution, use, and whether any restrictions apply.
I am not opposed to transparency, but I do not agree to being "ambushed." If stenography is requested, it should be handled as a procedural issue between counsel, with conditions established in advance so the evaluation can proceed in an orderly, fair, and defensible manner.
Respectfully,
Maria A. Babinetz
President, American Board of Vocational Experts (ABVE)
------------------------------
Maria Babinetz
Vocational Rehabilitation Expert
maria.babinetz@signaturerehab.com
Lansdale, PA United States
Original Message:
Sent: 01-21-2026 11:46
From: Connie Standhart MS CRC ABVEF
Subject: Stenographer Present at Online Vocational Evaluation
I am looking for input from others on having a stenographer present at an online vocational evaluation. She was hired by opposing counsel. I contacted the defense attorney that contracted my services and the evaluation was cancelled for the time being. I was given no prior notice, which would be a minimum expectation, I would think, with consent also being required. I don't agree to being ambushed.
What are your thoughts on allowing a stenographer to transcribe a vocational evaluation? What preliminary steps would/do you take? What follow-up expectations do you require? What are the possible negative outcomes for a vocational expert for allowing this type of recording of the vocational interview?
The venue is Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas.
------------------------------
Connie L. Standhart, MS, CRC, ABVE/F
Peak Solutions Vocational Services
------------------------------