Discussion: View Thread

BLS

  • 1.  BLS

    Posted 08-01-2025 23:34

    NYT today:

    "President Trump unleashed his fury about weakness in the labor market on Friday, saying without evidence that the data were "rigged" and that he was firing the Senate-confirmed Department of Labor official responsible for pulling together the numbers each month."

    BLS labor market statistics are gold standard of the world. With the administration putting pressure on non-partisan statisticians regarding any stat which fails to comport with desired narrative, will BLS stats continue to be seen as reliable or increasingly open to challenge when used by VEs? I can see counsel picking up on this. Any statistic the supreme leader does not like may simply be targeted to "adjust". So, Mr./Ms. VE how do we know that X or Y BLS statistic is accurate and not arbitrarily adjusted and phony?" 



    ------------------------------
    Scott T. Stipe, MA, CRC, IPEC, D/ABVE
    Certified Rehabilitation Counselor
    Board Certified Vocational Expert
    Scott Stipe & Associates, Inc.
    DBA Career Directions Northwest
    4110 SE Hawthorne Blvd
    #188
    Portland, Oregon, 97214
    (503)807-2668
    email: sstipecrc@gmail.com
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: BLS

    Posted 08-02-2025 13:24
    Edited by Carly N Coughlin 08-02-2025 13:25

    I can see this happening as well.  This could be a big problem. I am not sure how I would reply to that question.  



    ------------------------------
    Carly Coughlin, MS CRC
    carly@coughlinvoc.com
    Coughlin Vocational Counseling, LLC
    1201 Terminal Way Suite 111
    Reno, NV
    89502
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: BLS

    Posted 08-02-2025 16:10

    Wall Street is saying the same thing. If the object is intent to mess with the Jobs Numbers as some sort of backhand gottcha way to mess with Chairman Powell (who Trump himself appointed and who says rates would have already dropped were it not for the volatility caused by tariffs) it will be an interesting ride in financial markets.

    Trump also said recently that prices for various items are declining up to 100% of more. Such would of course mean that the consumer is getting the item for free or the retailer is paying something to take it from them. And Beef just hit an all time high price. I thought I was bad at math!



    ------------------------------
    Scott T. Stipe, MA, CRC, IPEC, D/ABVE
    Certified Rehabilitation Counselor
    Board Certified Vocational Expert
    Scott Stipe & Associates, Inc.
    DBA Career Directions Northwest
    4110 SE Hawthorne Blvd
    #188
    Portland, Oregon, 97214
    (503)807-2668
    email: sstipecrc@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: BLS

    Posted 08-03-2025 11:16

    Sometimes, stupid people show their stupidity. I you fire the person identified as responsible for the labor market stats because you didn't like them, who will believe the stats now. Florida's DeSantis did that with the AHCA COVID stats, firing the reporting stats person. Of course, if the economic indicators are falling, that justifies a lower FED interest rate. Stupid on stupid.

     

     

    Best regards,

    Jeff Barrett, M.Ed., CAP. CRC, CVE, CCM
    Options Plus

    optionsplusinc.com
    954-929-9694


    The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for the addressee. The information contained herein may be privileged and confidential. If you have received this transmission in error, any use, reproduction or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail reply, do not produce copies of this transmission or any attachments, and delete this message and its attachments, if any.

     






  • 5.  RE: BLS

    Posted 08-03-2025 15:56

    So, the question is, what statistics do we use after a yes-person is appointed?



    ------------------------------
    June Hagen
    Vocational Consultant
    drjunehagen@yahoo.com
    Santa Monica, CA United States
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: BLS

    Posted 08-03-2025 17:17
    June, 

    I would say we continue to use the ORS data as it was collected prior to last week's firing.  At least for the time being, we can rely on that data collection and report.



    Best Regards,
    Lynne Tracy, M.A., LMFT, CRC, ABVE/D
    Vocational Counseling 
    P.O. Box 8333, Calabasas, CA 91372
    Direct: (818) 880-6460  
    FAX:  (818) 880-6494   
     
    Electronic Disclosure Statement:  This e-mail is not encrypted.  If you are communicating about a client, please DO NOT place the person's full name or personal information in the e-mail or subject line since this is an unsecured form of communication.  Any communication regarding a client is considered work product and will become part of the file.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and remove the information from all electronic and hard copy sources.  Storing, printing, or disseminating this e-mail to other parties is prohibited unless authorized by the sender.





  • 7.  RE: BLS

    Posted 08-03-2025 17:52
    What about for wages?

    Cynthia (Cindy) Engebose
    Lone Oak Vocational Consulting LLC
    PO Box 14042
    West Allis, WI 53214
    414-687-2280
    "All Work is Important"


    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the message.

    Sent with Proton Mail secure email.





  • 8.  RE: BLS

    Posted 08-04-2025 09:44
    As always - a statistic is easily backed up
    or debunked.

    If an expert is relying on a statistic for the basis of their testimony without the good solid research to back it up well then that’s a problem

    Especially when the BLS is still listing 2023 stats- that are based on 2021 information- read the methodology.

    We all know the world of wages etc has changed significantly since 2021

    An expert is hired for their expertise- not their ability to recite stats.

    This is not political, this is common sense.


    Beth




  • 9.  RE: BLS

    Posted 08-04-2025 10:11
    So very true....

    This e-mail, and any attachments enclosed, is intended for the use of the addressee only and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of the information contained herewith is strictly prohibited. Also, please notify me by way of return e-mail or by way of telephone at 406-755-3934.





  • 10.  RE: BLS

    Posted 08-04-2025 11:36

    How exactly would you as an individual/expert possibly "debunk" the "Jobs number" or any other government statistic? I guess it could be argued that any government statistic, or other statistic, once data is collected, analyzed, published is "out of date" It should be interesting. We are obviously in an anti-intellectual period in which experts are despised/rejected, fact and truth conveniently labelled "fake news", simple questions are not answered or are answered with word salad, and supposed "common sense" praised over that awful science stuff. Unless of course such "common sense" comes from someone with an opposing view, now labelled a "low IQ individual".

    Contrary to what you say experts in all fields routinely "recite" statistics, typically many and different source/types of stats to back up and illustrate opinions and their own expertise in expert reports/testimony.

    Perhaps the whacky rejection of statistics not comporting with a desired false narrative may lead VEs back to the time- honored VR practice of doing Labor Market Survey/employer sampling/hypothesis testing. Such has been less performed recently and many VEs who don't/can't do it well or find it too difficult or just too "icky" say it is "impossible" They mock the small sample size and now I guess can also dismiss or call into question whatever government statistic as well. Experience/expertise/knowledge of subject/science forms our "common sense". 

    Maybe it really was a good time to retire!



    ------------------------------
    Scott T. Stipe, MA, CRC, IPEC, D/ABVE
    Certified Rehabilitation Counselor
    Board Certified Vocational Expert
    Scott Stipe & Associates, Inc.
    DBA Career Directions Northwest
    4110 SE Hawthorne Blvd
    #188
    Portland, Oregon, 97214
    (503)807-2668
    email: sstipecrc@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 11.  RE: BLS

    Posted 08-04-2025 12:01
    Perhaps this is helpful for context.

     Both Quantitative and qualitative knowledge is critical to the expert's opinion.

    The operational definition of "Clinical Judgement" was led by Dr. Tim Field, and significantly based on FRE 702 guiding expert testimony. Published in the JLCP.

    Clinical judgment requires that the final opinion
    be predicated on valid, reliable and relevant foundation
    information and data that are scientifically
    established through theory and technique
    building which has been tested, peer reviewed,
    and published, with known error rates, and is
    generally accepted within the professional community.
    In cases where any of the above factors do
    not apply, but other factors have greater relevance,
    the expert will rely on these other factors
    within a methodological approach, based on the
    expert's knowledge, skill, experience, training, or
    education in order to assist the trier of fact to
    reach a conclusion. Therefore, clinical judgment,
    which is the extension of the credentialing factors
    of the expert, encompasses all relevant factors germane
    to the weight of the case while discarding
    those factors which are not relevant, and which
    are allowed by the court. ( Field, Choppa et al. 2004. JLCP 3.3).

    Best,

    Tony

    Anthony J. Choppa, MEd, CRC, CCM, CDMS
    Rehabilitation Counselor/Case Manager
    OSC Vocational Systems, Inc
    10132 NE 185th
    Bothell, WA  98011
    425-486-4040 * 5220
    425-486-8701 fax

    REMINDER I will be out of the office and unavailable June 30 through July 8, 2025, August 18 through September 2, 2025, September 17 through 19, 2025, October 10 through 13, 2025, December 22, 2025 through January 2, 2026, February 13 through 20, 2026, April 15 through May 18, 2026.

    Disclaimer: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact me immediately.





  • 12.  RE: BLS

    Posted 08-04-2025 16:17
    Love that quote - use it often
    Have a great rest of your Monday
    Beth




  • 13.  RE: BLS

    Posted 08-04-2025 16:16
    To debunk a few of your unsolicited barbs- I was hired as an expert in 1991 for the first time. I continue to actively practice on both the plaintiff and defense sides and as an independent witness

    I have never presented stats without additional information - LMS, additional research beyond the BLS or whatever the case calls for hmmm ever.

    People do their job the way they do it and
    I do my job the way that I do.

    When an expert cannot back up their opinion - and the case goes south - that’s the breaks.

    I offered an answer to a specific question- which revolved around what do you do if you cannot use just stats.

    Sir, you have a lot to say about most posts that come along, usually you are less then gracious with your sage advice - IMHO arm chair quarterbacking and an op ed does not mentoring make- which I truly thought was the aim of this and all IARP forums.


    Beth




  • 14.  RE: BLS

    Posted 08-04-2025 17:15

    Madam, I still don't see where you have debunked anything in your non-answer to my question as to how it is allegedly easy to debunk statistics such as the Jobs Numbers. Nor do I find your opinion in any way humble (or mine less than).  Also, my LMS comment was not, of course, specific to you. I don't know you or your work. It was rather based upon what I have seen and heard and read here over four decades from other VEs who apparently have never done or no longer do LMS. My point is that if rejecting statistics/statisticians if they will (and they all surely will, if qualified/ethical) produce statistics not to one's liking/counter to dear myth/narrative, and also reject LMS, that will leave said VE in quite a pickle!   

    My concern in bringing up the BLS issue is for how exactly practicing colleagues and the profession will deal with it. I won't need to. I therefore lack anything but pure motive. I am concerned and interested in how all the other Sirs and Madams will deal with it in the short term (while fact is fiction, truth is lie, lie is truth, science is a doubted or a bother, and experts on just about anything one does not like are mocked.



    ------------------------------
    Scott T. Stipe, MA, CRC, IPEC, D/ABVE
    Certified Rehabilitation Counselor
    Board Certified Vocational Expert
    Scott Stipe & Associates, Inc.
    DBA Career Directions Northwest
    4110 SE Hawthorne Blvd
    #188
    Portland, Oregon, 97214
    (503)807-2668
    email: sstipecrc@gmail.com
    ------------------------------